A related issue I have is with lighter sentences for attempted crimes than for completed ones. Why does someone get off easier because they're incompetent? Or because they were stopped by someone else? So long as the intent was there in sufficient force to cause an actual attempt, the crime was as well as done from the perspective of the perpetrator, even if it was luckily not completed.
I understand why conspiracy doesn't get punished as severely. If we were all punished for the awful things we thought about doing, even maybe planned out how to do, we'd all be in jail. Even with desire to commit a crime established, though, you can never know if someone really would have gone through with it. Once a physical attempt has occurred, though?
These are just some thoughts, but I also have a nagging, nit-picky question: What's the legal difference between attempted murder and assault with a deadly weapon?
Interesting sidenote: I'm honestly not sure to what extent this is merely a continuation of or corollary to Thursday's post.